Thomas Alexander Love, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Nathan Rice, Warden; Henry W. Jones, Jr.; Nurse Barnes;doctor Stanley; I.w. Rose, Defendants-appellees, 802 F.2d 451 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseThomas Alexander Love, appellant pro se.
Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees Rice, Barnes, Stanley and Rose.
R. Frank Gray, Jordan, Brown, Price & Wall, for appellee Jones.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive is sues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument-and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Love v. Rice, C/A No. 85-1040 (E.D.N.C., Apr. 14, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
