David Allen Sumrall, Appellant, v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, Appellee, 801 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseDavid Allen Sumrall, appellant pro se.
Stephen H. Sachs, Richard Kastendieck, Attorney General's Office, for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order refusing relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Sumrall v. Warden, C/.A No. 84-0279 (D. Md., Feb. 25, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
