State of North Carolina, Appellee v. Byron Carlton Cumber, Appellant, 799 F.2d 751 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseBefore RUSSELL, HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
(Byron Carlton Cumber, Appellant Pro Se.)
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying the petition for removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443 is without merit.* Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. North Carolina v. Cumber, Misc. No. 86-30-5 (E.D.N.C., Mar. 6, 1986).
DISMISSED.
To the extent that Cumber's petition seeks alternative relief in the form of an injunction against further state criminal proceedings, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), clearly bars the grant of such relief
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
