Unpublished Dispositionautry Hatton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ashland Oil, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 793 F.2d 1291 (6th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 793 F.2d 1291 (6th Cir. 1986) 5/13/86

AFFIRMED

E.D. Mich.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, Senior District Judge.* 

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff Autry Hatton appeals pro se from the judgment for defendant entered on a jury verdict. Hatton brought this diversity action against Ashland Oil, the manufacturer of certain chemicals that were stored in drums at Hatton's workplace. He alleged that the drums emitted harmful fumes from the chemicals within and did not contain the warning labels necessary to give him notice of the danger.

Hatton has raised numerous issues on appeal, relating primarily to the conduct of the trial and admission of evidence. This court, having reviewed the briefs and record, finds no grounds for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment below is AFFIRMED.

 *

The Honorable William K. Thomas, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.