Unpublished Dispositioneric P. Rotondo, Plaintiff-appellant v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendant-appellee, 791 F.2d 935 (6th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 791 F.2d 935 (6th Cir. 1986) 4/8/86

VACATED AND REMANDED


ORDER

BEFORE: MARTIN and GUY, Circuit Judges; REED, District Judge.* 

This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the appellee's motion to vacate, appellant's response, appellant's brief and the record; this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It appears that attached to the appellee's motion for summary judgment in the district court was a declaration of a Special Agent. Appellee states on appeal that the declaration contained a mistaken statement of fact which allegedly formed an essential basis for the decision granting the appellee's motion for summary judgment.

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings. Rule 9(d) (4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit Costs on appeal to be awarded to appellant.

 *

The Honorable Scott Reed, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.