Unpublished Dispositionclark J. Mcmillan, Plaintiff-appellant v. Lt. D. Mills and Herman C. Davis, Warden, Defendants-appellees, 791 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 791 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1986) 4/2/86

AFFIRMED

W.D. Tenn.

ORDER

BEFORE: KEITH and NELSON, Circuit Judges; and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.


This appeal has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After examination of the record and the briefs filed by the parties, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His action stems from a work stoppage at Ft. Pillow Prison. As a result of the work stoppage, several hundred inmates were confined in the prison yard for three days. A review of the record indicates that the plaintiff's due process argument and his cruel and unusual punishment contentions are without merit.

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is affirmed for the reasons stated in the March 28, 1985, order of the district court. Rule 9(d) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.