Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Danny C. Stockard, Defendant-appellant, 765 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 765 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1985) 5/13/85

ORDER

BEFORE: KEITH, MARTIN, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and transcript at government expense and his response to this Court's show cause order.

It appears from the record that the order denying reduction of sentence was entered July 18, 1984, though not received by appellant until July 24, 1984. The notice of appeal was mailed on July 26, 1984. The notice of appeal filed on July 31, 1984 was one day late. Rules 4(b) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983); United States v. Hoye, 548 F.2d 1271 (6th Cir. 1977). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice to any right of appellant to seek an extension of time from the district court for filing the July 31, 1984, notice of appeal. Rule 9(d) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is further ORDERED that appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and transcript at government expense be and hereby is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.