Unpublished Dispositionclarence Corethers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Judge Roy Mcmahon; Judge Thomas C. Matia; Prosecutor John T.corrigan; Grand Jury Michael W. Hill; Lawyer Daviddoughten; Sergeant O'brien; Stanleymurray; John James,defendants-appellees, 762 F.2d 1006 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 762 F.2d 1006 (6th Cir. 1985) 4/19/85

ORDER

BEFORE: KENNEDY, CONTIE, and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the motion of the appellant for appointment of counsel.

A review of the record indicates that an order was entered on February 5, 1985, dismissing four of the eight defendants in this civil rights action. On February 19, 1985, Corethers appealed from the February 5 order. The order disposed of fewer than all the parties involved in the action. The district court did not expressly determine that there is no just reason for delay and did not direct entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the order appealed is not final and appealable. McIntyre v. First National Bank of Cincinnati, 585 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1978); Moody v. Kapica, 548 F.2d 133 (6th Cir. 1976); Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company, 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir. 1973).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and it hereby is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.