Roadway Express, Inc., Petitioner, Cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Cross-petitioner, 742 F.2d 591 (11th Cir. 1984)
Annotate this CaseFisher & Phillips, Michael C. Towers, Mark E. Edwards, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent.
Joseph A. Oertel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner.
Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before HENDERSON and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
On April 2, 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 104 S. Ct. 1699, 80 L. Ed. 2d 173, vacated the judgment of this court (700 F.2d 687) in this cause, and remanded the cause for further consideration in light of National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc., 465 U.S. ----, 104 S. Ct. 1505, 79 L. Ed. 2d 839 (1984).
On reconsideration, in light of the Supreme Court's acceptance of the NLRB's "Interboro doctrine" (Interboro Contractors, Inc., 157 N.L.R.B. 1295, 1298 (1966), enforced 388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)), we apply that doctrine and enforce that portion of the Board's order directing Roadway Express to expunge the warning letters issued to Wilson and Howard.
ENFORCED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
