Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408phyllis Sanders, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company, et al., Defendants-appellees, 730 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1984)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 730 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1984) Argued March 19, 1984. Decided March 28, 1984

Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., New York City, on brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before MANSFIELD, NEWMAN and PRATT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr., Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co., 582 F. Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y. 1983).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.