Carl Edwin Wiggins, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dan v. Mckaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 729 F.2d 1026 (5th Cir. 1984)
Annotate this CaseCraig Smyser, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
Leslie A. Benitez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Fred Shannon, Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before GARZA, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 104 S. Ct. 1620, 79 L. Ed. 2d ----, has reversed the judgment of this Court, 681 F.2d 266, and remanded the cause to us for further procedures in conformity with its opinion.
Accordingly, it is now ordered that the judgment of the district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
