Terry Ray Taylor, Appellant, v. West Publishing Company; President of West Publishingcompany; Editor of West Publishing Company;board of Directors of West Publishingcompany; Stockholders of Westpublishing Company, Appellees, 693 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1982)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 693 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1982) Submitted Nov. 30, 1982. Decided Dec. 3, 1982

Terry Ray Taylor, pro se.

Vance K. Opperman, Opperman & Paquin, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

Before BRIGHT, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Terry Ray Taylor appeals pro se from the district court's1  dismissal, 548 F. Supp. 61, of his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellant alleges that West Publishing Co. libeled him by publishing and distributing defamatory remarks contained in Taylor v. Gibson, 529 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1976), an opinion written by Judge Bryan Simpson of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Appellant further claims that the district court erred in denying his motion to add Judge Simpson as a defendant.

The district court held that West Publishing Co. was cloaked with absolute immunity from suit for libel in publishing verbatim judicial opinions. See Lowenschuss v. West Publishing Co., 542 F.2d 180 (3d Cir. 1976). The court further held that Judge Simpson's act of writing the opinion in Taylor v. Gibson was a judicial act within the jurisdiction of the court and thus absolutely privileged. See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57, 98 S. Ct. 1099, 1104-05, 55 L. Ed. 2d 331 (1978).

After reviewing the record in this case, we have concluded the district court did not err either legally or factually in dismissing this case and refusing to add Judge Simpson as a defendant. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 14.

 1

The Honorable Diana E. Murphy, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.