Dr. Premanand v. Wagh, Appellant, v. James L. Dennis, Chancellor; Thomas A. Bruce, Dean, in Theirindividual and Official Capacities As Agents Ofthe University of Arkansas for Medicalsciences, Appellees, 677 F.2d 666 (8th Cir. 1982)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 677 F.2d 666 (8th Cir. 1982) Submitted May 7, 1982. Decided May 11, 1982

John W. Walker, Richard Quiggle, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Nelwyn Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., Ray Trammell, Gen. Counsel, Fayetteville, Ark., for appellees.

Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Premanand V. Wagh appeals the dismissal by the district court1  of his complaint asserting a claim under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 as being barred by the three-year Arkansas statute of limitations governing liabilities created by statute. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 37-206. We affirm.

Appellant asserts that since his case involves termination of his written employment contract that the five-year Arkansas statute of limitations governing actions on written contracts should control. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 37-209. This argument is without merit. The choice between sections 37-209 and 37-206 for a civil rights action involving termination or non-renewal of an employment contract has been presented to this court on several occasions and each time this court has held that the appropriate statute of limitations is section 37-206. Marshall v. Kirkland, 602 F.2d 1282 (8th Cir. 1979); Martin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 568 F.2d 58 (8th Cir. 1977); Clark v. Mann, 562 F.2d 1104 (8th Cir. 1977).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

 1

The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.