Susan B. Long and Philip H. Long, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, United States Department Ofcommerce, Defendant-appellant, 671 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1982)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 671 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1982) March 12, 1982

Before TANG, SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The panel determines that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded our initial disposition of this case, Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 646 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir.), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 102 S. Ct. 468, 70 L. Ed. 2d 242 (1981), for reconsideration in light of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Section 701, Pub. L. No.97-34, 95 Stat. 172. Pursuant to this mandate, we vacate the district court judgment and remand the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the same statutory provision. Our order of May 4, 1981 is reinstated insofar as the appellees are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs for trial and appellate proceedings up to that date in an amount to be determined by the district court on remand.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.