26 Fair Empl.prac.cas. 1017,27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,210michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree,plaintiffs- Appellees, v. C. Itoh & Company (america) Inc., Defendant-appellant, 654 F.2d 302 (5th Cir. 1981)
Annotate this CaseUnit A
Aug. 7, 1981.
Fulbright & Jaworski, Neil Martin, Nancy Morrison O'Connor, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Porter & Clements, Edward John O'Neill, Jr., Charles E. Humphrey, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Lutz Alexander Prager, Marcia Beth Ruskin, E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 24, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981, 643 F.2d 353).
Before BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Administrative Unit of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Administrative Unit in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Administrative Unit of the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
