Robert P. Mcdaniel, Plaintiff-appellee Cross-appellant, v. the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, Defendant-appellantcross Appellee.jan T. Barksdale, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Peoples Financial Corp. of Alpharetta, Defendant-appellant.james R. Barrett et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Vernie Jones Ford, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellants, 554 F.2d 1391 (5th Cir. 1977)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 554 F.2d 1391 (5th Cir. 1977) June 8, 1977

Marion H. Allen, III, Richard R. Cheatham, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant in No. 75-2410.

E. Lundy Baety, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee in No. 75-2410.

Albert C. Ruehmann, III, Richard R. Cheatham, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants in Nos. 75-2514 and 75-2515.

Graydon W. Florence, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 75-2514.

Sewell K. Loggins, Douglas N. Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., for amicus curiae Beneficial Finance Co.

Mary Joyce Johnson, N. David Buffington, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees in No. 75-2515.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 6, 1976, 5 Cir., 1976, 543 F.2d 568).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

The parties in No. 75-4397, Kennedy v. Plaza Pontiac, No. 75-4408, Reed v. Welch Oldsmobile and No. 76-1158, Hicks v. General Motors, 5 Cir., 544 F.2d 516 are entitled without further leave to timely file amicus briefs if they so desire.

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge, is recused and did not participate in this order.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.