John Wesley Clutchette et al., Appellees, v. Jerry J. Enomoto1 et al., Appellants, 536 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1976)Annotate this Case
William D. Stein, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
William Bennett Turner (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before TUTTLE,* HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
Insofar as our opinions in Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 809, and Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1975) 510 F.2d 613, are inconsistent with Enomoto v. Clutchette, sub nom. Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976) --- U.S. ----, 96 S. Ct. 1551, 47 L. Ed. 2d 810, we vacate our prior opinions.
The cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Baxter v. Palmigiano, supra.