David C. Parker, D/b/a Royal Professional Cleaners &laundry, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers Union Local 218,et al., Defendants,josephine B. Crawley, Fred Lee Debardeleben, Lorettaspeight, Sophronia Fells and Martha Shelton,defendants-appellants, 517 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1975)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 517 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1975) Aug. 15, 1975

Caryl P. Privett, U. W. Clemon, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants.

Robert F. Childs, Jr., C. V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Donald L. Newsom, Birmingham, Ala., Joseph Jacobs, Atlanta, Ga., for Laundry, Etc., Union, Local 218.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


It appearing that all the parties agree that matters giving rise to this appeal are moot on the basis of uncontested affidavits, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded with direction to dismiss the proceeding as being moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 1950, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S. Ct. 104, 95 L. Ed. 36; Gooden v. Mississippi State University, 5 Cir., 1974, 499 F.2d 441, 443-44; Reynolds v. Kelley, 5 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 1331; Troy State University v. Dickey, 5 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 515, 516-17; Lebus, Regional Director v. Seafarers' Int'l Union, 5 Cir., 1968, 398 F.2d 281, 283.

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.