David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and As Agent, et al.,defendants-appellees, 516 F.2d 1396 (2d Cir. 1975)Annotate this Case
Submitted May 29, 1975. Decided May 30, 1975
Feldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank Western and Marine Midland Bank Rochester.
Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.
Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendant-appellee Union Commerce Bank.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
We affirm upon Judge Bonsal's well considered opinion reported at 382 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation