National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Mission Rubber Company, Inc., Respondent, 496 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1974)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 496 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1974) June 19, 1974

A. Bashir (argued), Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

A. Patrick Nagel (argued), Stephen C. Drummy, of Nagel, Regan & Davidson, Newport Beach, Cal., for respondent.

Before DUNIWAY the GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,1  District judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


The petitioning Board's decision and order are published at 202 N.L.R.B. No. 17, 82 L.R.R.M. 1801 (1973). The Board's findings that Mission Rubber violated sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a) (1) and 158(a) (3), are supported by substantial evidence. See NLRB v. Miller Redwood Co., 407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Board's order will be enforced.

 1

The Honorable Otto R. Skopil, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.