National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, the Unitedstates Playing Card Company, Intervenor, v. Cincinnati Local 271, Lithoggraphers & Photoengraversinternational Union, Afl-cio, Respondents, 495 F.2d 763 (6th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CasePeter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Richard A. Cohen, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.
Harold S. Freeman, Gregory L. Hellrung, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for intervenor, The United States Playing Card Co.; Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel.
Eugene Cotton, Russell Woody, Chicago, Ill., on brief, for respondents; Cotton, Watt, Jones, King & Bowlus, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.
Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel. Upon due consideration thereof, the court is of the opinion that while it might have been better to defer the issues therein to arbitration, the Board's failure to do so does not amount to an abuse of discretion, and it further appearing to the court that the decision and order of the Board, reported at 204 NLRB No. 65, are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, now therefore
It is ordered that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
