7 Fair Empl.prac.cas. 666, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9251neil Abraham Bradington A. K. A. Neil Abraham Brad A. K. A.mohamed Mohamed Ibrahim Barad, Appellant v. International Business Machines Corporation, Appellee, 492 F.2d 1240 (4th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseBefore CRAVEN, BUTZNER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
Neil Abraham Bradington, proceeding pro se, appeals the order of the district court entering judgment for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in his action under Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq. Bradington alleges that he was discriminatorily discharged from IBM in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)-2 and Sec. 2000(e)-3(a). A careful examination of the lengthy record in this case reveals that Bradington's claims are without merit. The trial court was aware that Bradington was without the benefit of counsel1 and afforded him every consideration and accommodation both at trial and at the pretrial proceedings.
Finding no error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Affirmed.
On recommendation of the EEOC, the district court appointed counsel for the plaintiff; subsequently plaintiff decided to proceed pro se and requested that his court-appointed attorney withdraw
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
