Lee Chagra, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 487 F.2d 1330 (5th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseTowner Leeper, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ernest J. Brown, Acting Chief, App. Sec., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Act. Chief Counsel, IRS, Washington, D. C., and Ralph E. Harris, Asst. U. S. Atty., William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Crombie J. D. Garrett, James H. Bozarth, David English Carmack, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.
Before TUTTLE, GEWIN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We conclude that the delivery of the check to Chagra by Blott was not such assignment of the funds in the farmer's bank account as would defeat the priority of the Government's tax lien levied before the check cleared the bank. See Farmers State Bank of Center v. Latham, 181 S.W.2d 972 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana, 1944), no writ.
We do not reach the alternative theory of res judicata which was applied by the trial court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
