Jon F. and Constance M. Hartung, Petitioners-appellees, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellant, 484 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1973)
Annotate this CaseFred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Scott P. Crampton, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, K. Martin Worthy, IRS Chief Counsel, Meyer T. Rothwacks, Harry Baum, William K. Hogan, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellant.
Jon F. Hartung, in pro per.
Joseph H. Guttentag, of Surrey, Karasik & Morse, Washington, D. C., for amici curiae.
Before CHAMBERS and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,* District Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the Tax Court is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Sterrett, Hartung v. Commissioner, 1970, 55 T.C. 1, 5.
The Honorable Otto R. Skopil, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
