Charles G. M'clary, Petitioner-appellant, v. California Adult Authority, California Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 481 F.2d 1281 (9th Cir. 1973)
Annotate this CaseRobert W. Peterson, University of Santa Clara Law School, Santa Clara, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Karl J. Uebel, Deputy Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellee.
Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On petition for certiorari the judgment of this court, reported at 466 F.2d 1122 (1972), was vacated and the cause remanded to this court for further consideration in the light of Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. 2d 656 (1973).
Upon further consideration it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be, and it is hereby, vacated; and the cause is remanded to the District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in the light of Gagnon v. Scarpelli.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
