National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Buckeye Floral Company, Respondent, 475 F.2d 1139 (6th Cir. 1973)
Annotate this CaseMarjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert Sewell, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on brief.
Edward C. Kaminski, Akron, Ohio, for respondent; Buckingham, Doolitte & Burroughs and Herndon & Bartlo, Akron, Ohio, of counsel.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and KENT and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order issued May 25, 1972 against Buckeye Floral Company as reported at 197 NLRB No. 21.
Upon consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments, it appears to the Court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.
It is therefore ordered that the order of the Board be, and it is hereby, enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
