Raymond M. Hamilton, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Defendant-appellant (two Cases), 469 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1973)
Annotate this CaseSanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F. Supp. 1251 (N.D. Cal. 1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
