United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr., Appellant, 455 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseGeorge Haverstick (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Lyn I. Goldberg, Asst U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Acting Chief, Crim. Div., Douglas G. Hendricks, Howard G. Hendricks, Howard B. Frank, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this case involving two counts related to bank robbery and one count of use of a telephone for false threats is affirmed.
The double jeopardy argument is rejected under Haddad v. United States, 349 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 896, 86 S. Ct. 193, 15 L. Ed. 2d 153 (1965).
We find the evidence quite sufficient.
We find no abuse of discretion in permitting a confederate to testify out of order at the second trial and no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for new trial.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
