United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Frank Howard Blum, Defendant and Appellant, 453 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseRon Bain (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Crim. Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The appeal from the order entered on a post conviction hearing is affirmed. The hearing was required by this court 432 F.2d 250 on the authority of Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S. Ct. 1774, 12 L. Ed. 2d 908 (1964).
We find that the defendant's confession (or admissions) was properly admitted in evidence and the co-defendant's stipulated testimony was properly received.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
