Andrew Robert Banks, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, Defendant-appellant, 450 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseFrank A. Howard, Jr., James T. Schoenbrod, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
Richard Yale Feder & Arma Feder, Tobias Simon, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before TUTTLE, GEWIN and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
This case originated as a three-judge case, Banks v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 314 F. Supp. 285 (S.D. Fla. 1970) and was reversed and remanded for a fresh decree by the Supreme Court, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S. Ct. 1223, 28 L. Ed. 2d 526 (1971). Upon remand the single district judge entered the order here appealed adopting as his findings of fact and conclusions of law that portion of the opinion of the three-judge court concerning the Frist Amendment challenge to Board Regulation 6122.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
