Donald Eugene Taylor, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of Texas, et al., Respondents-appellees, 448 F.2d 652 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseDonald E. Taylor, pro se.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Roland Daniel Green, III, Austin, Tex., for respondents appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.;see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N. Y., et al., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
The contentions presented by the appellant in his habeas petition are: (1) he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent while on parole; and (2) he is not required to exhaust state remedies prior to filing a Federal habeas petition because Art. 11.07, Vernon's Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional, and therefore an inadequate and ineffective State remedy
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.