National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Teledyne Republic Manufacturing, Respondent, 448 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseBernard Levine, N. L. R. B., Assistant Regional Atty., Region 8, Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for petitioner.
Arthur A. Kola, Cleveland, Ohio, John J. Adams, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief, for respondent.
Before BROOKS, MILLER and KENT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This cause came on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel. Upon due consideration thereof and the facts as set forth in the record, and the report of the case, 185 N.L.R.B. No. 129, it appears to this Court that while the members of the panel might have reached a different conclusion the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole and should be enforced.
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
