Peter D. Bogart, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Harlon B. Carter, As Regional Commissioner of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, Etc., et al., Appellees, 445 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles H. Carr, Judge.
Phill Silver, Hollywood, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Chief, Crim. Div., Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.
The summary judgment rendered against plaintiff-appellant is reversed. We think this is indicated by In re Ruffalo (1968), 390 U.S. 544, 88 S. Ct. 1222, 20 L. Ed. 2d 117, and Theard v. United States (1957), 354 U.S. 278, 77 S. Ct. 1274, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1342. We believe Bogart has a constitutional right to a hearing before the agency before being denied the right to further practice before the agency, department regulations to the contrary notwithstanding.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
