United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Michael Vincent Catalano, Appellant, 444 F.2d 1095 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied August 24, 1971
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Howard B. Turrentine, Judge.
Russell E. Parsons (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Phillip N. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction for perjury before a grand jury is affirmed.
The point about counsel before the grand jury is well settled adverse to Catalano. Also, we find the testimony was material.
We find other points raised without merit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
