Lloyd Frederick Van Horn et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. United States of America, Appellant, 444 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1971)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 444 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1971) August 5, 1971

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.

Leonard Schaitman (argued), Dept. of Justice, William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

James C. Hagedorn (argued), Hoberg, Finger, Brown & Abramson, Bacigalupi, Elkus & Salinger, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment in favor of appellees is affirmed on the authority of Stork v. United States (9 Cir., 1970), 430 F.2d 1104.

It appears that our opinion and judgment in Van Horn v. United States (9th Cir. 1971), 437 F.2d 94, affects only the denial of relief to the mother and father of the deceased.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.