George Sing Louie, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Carnevale et al., Defendants-appellees, 443 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseGeorge Sing Louie, in pro. per.
Michael J. Brady, of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner, Redwood City, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed. R. Civ. P.
The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S. Ct. 356, 50 L. Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S. Ct. 926, 25 L. Ed. 2d 100 (1970).1
There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
