Benjamin Ginsberg, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 443 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Warren J. Ferguson, Judge.
Benjamin Ginsberg (argued), in pro. per.
George T. Altman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Carleton Powell (argued), Atty. for Dept. of Justice, Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Lawrence V. Brookes, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The order denying relief under Rule 60(b), F.R.Civ.P., from a judgment entered for a tax liability of Ginsberg is affirmed.
The issue has been here before. Ginsberg v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 408 F.2d 1016, and taxpayer lost. Our prior decision concludes Ginsberg now.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
