Virgil Lee Smith, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Paul R. Lemon, Manager, Cotton Textile Mill Industries, San Quentin State Prison, et al., Respondents and Appellees, 442 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1971)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 442 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1971) April 22, 1971

Virgil Lee Smith, in pro. per.

Evelle J. Younger, Cal. Atty. Gen., Derald E. Granberg, Karl S. Mayer, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents and appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, CARTER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Smith, a prisoner at California's state prison at San Quentin, lost one finger and a second was badly damaged while working in the textile mill. It was the sort of thing on which a free man would ordinarily have workman's compensation coverage.

Apparently believing the civil rights acts a catch-all for miscellaneous grievances, he filed action No. 50,773 in the Northern District of California. This was dismissed with prejudice. Then he filed action No. C69-197 ACW in the same court. This was dismissed on the ground of res judicata. Then he filed No. C70-1016 ACW. (In the three complaints there was some juggling of parties.) The third complaint was likewise dismissed on the ground of res judicata.

This appeal is from the dismissal in the third action. We affirm.

The res judicata ground is good. And, there would be several other good ones.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.