Harry L. Davis, Petitioner and Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 441 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseHarry L. Davis, in pro. per.
Richard Burke, U.S. Atty., Fred C. Mather, Morton Sitver, Asst. U.S. Attys., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F. Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S. Ct. 1062, 19 L. Ed. 2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S. Ct. 1463, 25 L. Ed. 2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.
The defendant was carefrlly and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
