Barney Saxon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Automatic Retailers of America, Ica, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 438 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Seybourn H. Lynne, Judge.
R. Clifford Fulford, Max Pope, Robert C. Garrison, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant; Levine, Fulford & Pope, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.
Robert G. Tate, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee; Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr & Murray, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice* , and GEWIN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this diversity case Saxon contends that the district court erred in holding that he was not entitled to reformation of a stock option agreement. It is our opinion that the trial court decided the case correctly. Saxon v. A. R. A. Services, Inc. (Formerly Automatic Retailers of America, Inc.), 322 F. Supp. 1309 (N. D.Alabama 1970).
Judgment affirmed.
Associate Justice United States Supreme Court (Ret.), sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
