United States of America, Appellee, v. Raquel Grijalva, Appellant, 436 F.2d 420 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied February 26, 1971
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; James A. Walsh, Judge.
Jacqueline Schneider (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.
Ann Bowen (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.
Before MADDEN,* and MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, Raquel Grijalva, appeals from her conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 111 (assaulting a federal officer).
The only point on appeal that requires comment is her contention that evidence admitted against her, over objection, was the product of an illegal search and seizure. Despite the able and ingenious arguments of counsel, we think the search in this case fell within the bounds of Warden v. Hayden (1967) 387 U.S. 294, 87 S. Ct. 1642, 18 L. Ed. 2d 782 and thus did not run athwart her Fourth Amendment rights.
The judgment is affirmed.
Hon. J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge, United States Court of Claims, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
