Filtrol Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. the Slick Corporation et al., Appellants, 428 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Albert Lee Stephens, Jr., Judge.
Everett B. Clary (argued), of O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Moses Lasky (argued), of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the district court granting a temporary injunction is affirmed. The provisions seem reasonable as intermediate relief.
We do not reach the question of whether the provisions of the temporary injunction would be appropriate if there ultimately is found to be a violation of the Clayton Act.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
