Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc., Appellees, v. Pneumafil Corporation, Appellant, 427 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseDecided June 8, 1970
Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N. C., on brief) for appellant.
Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N. C., on brief) for appellees.
Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant's patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge's findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court's opinion, 303 F. Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C. 1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
