Frelin Construction Company, a Corporation, and Charles Weissman and Bernard Weissman, Individually, and As Partners T/a Frelin Construction Company v. George E. Yundt, Frelin Construction Company, a Corporation, Appellant.frelin Construction Company, a Corporation, and Charles Weissman and Bernard Weissman, Individually, and As Partners T/a Frelin Construction Company v. George E. Yundt, Charles Weissman and Bernard Weissman, Individually, and As Partners T/a Frelin Construction Company, Appellants, 417 F.2d 312 (3d Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 5, 1969
As Amended December 9, 1969
Gerald P. Roth, Allentown, Pa., for appellants.
Harold Cramer, Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe & Levin, Philadelphia, Pa. (Henry A. Stein, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HASTIE, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.*
This appeal has been taken from the dismissal with prejudice of a fourth amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted.
The claim is contractual. We agree with the district court that the appellant failed, after ample opportunity to amend his complaint, adequately to allege facts which would make the appellee either an original party to the contract in suit or a party by reason of ratification of an originally unauthorized undertaking of another on his behalf.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Although Judge Van Dusen was present during the argument of the above case, he did not take part in its decision
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
