Richard Lee Ingle, Petitioner-appellant, v. Cletus J. Fitzharris, Respondent-appellee, 411 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseRichard Lee Ingle, pro se, appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to our mandate in Ingle v. Fitzharris, 375 F.2d 398 (9th Cir., 1967). The factual issues identified in our opinion were fully explored at the hearing. The district court found that the evidence failed to sustain appellant's allegations. Appellant merely reasserts the allegations rejected below. The record discloses no reason to disturb the district court's findings.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
