In the Matter of A-cos Leasing Corporation, Debtor, Petitioner, v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Respondent.in the Matter of Sarge-tex Motors Corporation, Debtor, Petitioner, v. Honorable J. Ingraham, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Respondent, 408 F.2d 492 (5th Cir. 1969)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 408 F.2d 492 (5th Cir. 1969) February 7, 1969

Alonza O. C. Sargent, Houston, Tex., for petitioner.

R. F. Wheless, Jr., Houston, Tex., for respondent.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

PER CURIAM:


The petitioners ask this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district judge to vacate his order denying the petitioners relief under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act. The writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and will issue only in limited and unusual circumstances: "(W)hile a function of mandamus in aid of appellate jurisdiction is to remove obstacles to appeal, it may not appropriately be used merely as a substitute for the appeal procedure prescribed by the statute." Roche v. Evaporated Milk Association, 1943, 319 U.S. 21, 26, 63 S. Ct. 938, 941, 87 L. Ed. 1185, 1190. The petitioners here maintain, without citing authority, that an appeal is impossible because no parties opposed the petitions that were dismissed below. The petitioners' premise is incorrect. In the Matter of Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc., 10 Cir. 1962, 311 F.2d 288. The petitions for writ of mandamus are accordingly denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.