Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-ruzic, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 402 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied December 2, 1968
Judgment Vacated April 1, 1969
See 89 S. Ct. 1222
Gregory S. Stout (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Wm. Shubb (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., John P. Hyland, U.S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant was properly charged. Conerly v. United States, 350 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1965).
Appellant's answer in the negative in response to an inquiry constituted a false representation under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Tzantarmas v. United States, 402 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1968); Brandow v. United States, 268 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1959).
Appellant was not deprived of a fair trial by reason of the District Court's response to provocative conduct on the part of appellant's trial counsel.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
