James A. Totton D/b/a Totton and Dunn Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Local 43 of United Association of Journeymen, Etc.,defendant-appellee, 402 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseSizer Chambliss, Chattanooga, Tenn., Jac Chambliss, Chattanooga, Tenn., on brief; Chambliss, Hodge, Bahner & Crawford, Chattanooga, Tenn., of counsel, for appellant.
S. Del Fuston, Chattanooga, Tenn., King & Fuston, Chattanooga, Tenn., of counsel, for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and McCREE and COMBS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The company has appealed from a judgment of the District Court holding that the language of a collective bargaining agreement provided for binding arbitration of all grievances except jurisdictional disputes. The parties had submitted to a joint conference board the question whether the union had a right to cancel the collective bargaining agreement on the ground that the employer had violated its provisions. The joint conference board found in favor of the union and the District Judge held the company was bound by the decision.
Upon consideration, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the District Judge's memorandum opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
