National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company, Respondent, 394 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseDecided April 11, 1968
William H. Carder, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William Wachter and Allen J. Berk, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner.
Lacy I. Rice, Jr., Martinsburg, W. Va. (John M. Miller, and Rice, Hannis, Rice & Wagner, Martinsburg, W. Va., on brief), for respondent.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board's findings that the employer violated § 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act by interrogating employees and creating an impression of surveillance and § 8(a) (3) by discriminatorily laying off a union adherent. We therefore enforce in its entirety the Board's order which enjoined further conduct of this character and required the employer to compensate the employee for earnings lost from the time of the layoff until her reinstatement.
Enforcement granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
