Sydney Ginsberg and Anna Ginsberg, Deceased, Sydney Ginsberg, Executor, Appellants, v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director, Internal Revenue for the District of Florida, Appellee, 393 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseSidney A. Soltz, Miami, Fla., for appellants.
Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph M. Howard, John M. Brant, Burton Berkley, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Steuer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., John P. Burke, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
It appearing that the prior decision of the Tax Court is res adjudicata as to the calendar year 1947, and that the findings of the Tax Court that the sum of $16,865.00 was fraudulently paid over to taxpayer and his brother equally, relates entirely to amounts of unreported income for the years January through November, 1948, there was no substantial issue of fact to withstand motion for summary judgment.
As to Mrs. Ginsberg's claim, there was no effort by her to show that the fraud penalty was paid by any of her funds. See Tomlinson v. Lefkovitz, 5 Cir., 334 F.2d 262.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
